1) Research the Ian Tomlinson case. What would the
traditional, hegemonic view of the police be in a case like this? How did new
and digital media create a different story? What does the police officer's
subsequent aquittal suggest about the power of new and digital media?
New and digital media creates the ability for citizen
journalism to challenge these views; in particular the statement from the
police stated that there were efforts to "save his (Ian Tomlinson) life
after he collapsed." However, video footage proves that the police's
version of events was not true. From a traditional, hegemonic view, this
particular police case is seen to be standard as police brutality is happening
more often. New and digital media help to enforce this as it proves the police
are abusing the power they have.
2) What does the author argue regarding whether hegemony is
being challenged by Web 2.0?
The author argues that there is less hegemony because
audiences no longer have to rely on traditional media and today audiences can
easily produce texts themselves. Therefore, injustices can be challenged more
easily
3) In your opinion, does new and digital media reinforce
dominant hegemonic views or give the audience a platform to challenge them?
The author argues that the internet is becoming more diverse
as there are more "amateur" and "professional"
opinions/viewpoints available. As audiences are challenging more, there is less
hegemony.
No comments:
Post a Comment